home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
122892
/
1228990.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
68 lines
<text id=92TT2884>
<title>
Dec. 28, 1992: Prof. Bill's Class:Political Econ.101
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Dec. 28, 1992 What Does Science Tell Us About God?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE WEEK, Page 12
NATION
Professor Bill's Class: Political Economy 101
</hdr><body>
<p>Clinton's summit played well, but his promises are looking harder
to keep
</p>
<p> It might not have lured many viewers from All My Children.
But when it came to furtive subplots, greed, jealousy and
spine-chilling intimations of impending disaster, Bill Clinton's
televised 19-hour economic talkathon was right up there with
daytime's most overwrought soap fare.
</p>
<p> On its face, the two-day Conference on the Economy, held
in Little Rock, served as a remarkable national teach-in, where
329 economists, corporate executives, labor leaders and other
interest-group advocates got a chance to pitch their favorite
nostrums to the President-elect. It provided the public with an
exhaustive review of the tough choices on taxes and spending
that face Clinton and the country. And it also allowed Clinton
to present himself in a flattering light: attentive, whip-smart
and lip-bitingly empathetic; the reading glasses perched
soberly at the end of his bulbous nose lent a touch of
presidential gravitas to his boyish looks.
</p>
<p> A key subplot of the summit was played out mostly
offstage, where Clinton and his aides began to worry about the
high cost of the myriad promises that got them elected. In tense
sessions before and after the conference, Clinton and his top
advisers fretted that his campaign pledge to cut the deficit in
half within four years--while cutting middle-class taxes and
spending more on everything from highways to veterans' benefits--now looks a lot tougher to meet than they expected. Failure
to fulfill it could prove as politically damaging to Clinton as
was President Bush's "no new taxes" vow.
</p>
<p> Clinton's economic advisers showed him charts
demonstrating that the deficit in 1996, without any changes,
will be more than $100 billion higher than they--and Bush--had estimated. Clinton's aides blame the Republican incumbent
for underplaying future costs for defense and the thrift
bailout, but they also admit cooking their own numbers. New
taxes on foreign firms, for example, are now expected to yield
only one-fifth of the $15 billion a year that Clinton promised.
</p>
<p> Clinton has scheduled private briefings this week to
consider some of the tough choices that he gave short shrift
during the economic summit: a hike in the gasoline tax, a new
national sales tax and a tax on employer-provided medical
insurance--each of which could be rebated to lower- and
middle-income taxpayers. Another option: "redefine" Clinton's
pledge by vowing to eliminate the deficit by the end of his
second term.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>